Skip to Login
Skip to Content
Skip to Secondary Navigation
RCAF 2016 Judge Survey
Please enter your name:
Rank the quality of feedback you felt you were able to provide presenters, considering the interdisciplinary nature of the conference.
High quality: I felt confident in providing quality feedback about most, or all, topics.
Sufficient: I felt equipped to provide feedback, despite some areas outside of my expertise.
Low quality: I felt I would have been more valuable as a judge in one of the other 7 categories
Insufficient: My knowledge and expertise was not applicable to the category I was assigned.
What changes might make the scoring process more effective?
Were the breaks throughout the day helpful? How did you spend your down time during RCAF?
Rank the effectiveness of communications between you and the GPC RCAF Organizing Committee.
Needs significant improvement
How might communications between judges and the GPC Planning Committee be improved?
Overall, how would you rank your experience at RCAF 2016?
What is one change that could be made to improve RCAF?
May we contact you to serve as a judge at 34th RCAF, which will be in March 2017?
If yes, when would be the most convenient time to contact you?
Thank you! We hope to see you again next year!
Loading... Please Wait